Key result
A levosimendan-based strategy reduced the incidence of acute kidney injury compared to standard inotropic therapy in heart transplant patients (OR 0.21; 95% CI 0.09-0.62; p=0.01).
Why the study?
Does a levosimendan-based strategy improve renal function early after heart transplantation compared to standard inotropic therapy?
RCT (n=94)
randomized
Does a levosimendan-based strategy improve renal function early after heart transplantation compared to standard inotropic therapy?
A levosimendan-based strategy early after heart transplantation may improve renal function and reduce acute kidney injury compared to standard inotropic therapy, despite an increased need for vasopressors.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant levosimendan preference to lower post-transplant AKI; extends RCT evidence on inotropes to heart transplantation.
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the effects of a levosimendan (LS)-based strategy compared with standard inotropic therapy on renal function in heart transplantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a randomized study design, 94 patients were assigned to LS-based therapy or standard inotropic support. At the time of transplantation, the groups did not differ in age, gender, heart failure etiology, hemodynamic profile, LVEF, or comorbidities. While there were no differences in serum creatinine (sCr) or eGFR between groups at baseline, patients in the LS group had a greater increase in their relative eGFR (62% vs. 12%, p = 0.002) and a lower incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) (28% vs. 6%, p = 0.01) during the first post-transplant week. On logistic regression analysis, correlates of AKI were randomization to LS therapy (OR = 0.21 [0.09-0.62], p = 0.01), baseline renal dysfunction (OR = 3.9 [1.1-13.6], p = 0.032), and diabetes mellitus (OR = 4.2 [1.1-16.5], p = 0.038). However, LS was associated with a greater need for additional norepinephrine therapy (40 [85%] vs. 15 [31%], p < 0.001) and a trend toward longer intensive care unit stay (9.5 ± 9.0 d vs. 7.0 ± 6.0 d, p = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing heart transplantation, levosimendan-based strategy may be associated with better renal function when compared to standard therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kneževič et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in heart transplantation (n=94). levosimendan-based strategy vs. standard inotropic therapy was evaluated on acute kidney injury (AKI) (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.09-0.62, p=0.01). A levosimendan-based strategy reduced the incidence of acute kidney injury compared to standard inotropic therapy in heart transplant patients (OR 0.21; 95% CI 0.09-0.62; p=0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: