Key result
The WHODAS 2.0 questionnaire demonstrated construct validity and responsiveness, correlating with EQ-5D-3L usual activities (rho 0.45; 95% CI 0.30-0.52) at 1 year after major surgery.
Why the study?
Expert recommendations propose the WHODAS 2.0 as a core outcome measure in surgical studies, but data on its long-term measurement properties remain limited.
Does the WHODAS 2.0 questionnaire demonstrate construct validity and responsiveness for evaluating functional status 1 year after inpatient non-cardiac surgery?
Cohort (n=546)
Does the WHODAS 2.0 questionnaire demonstrate construct validity and responsiveness for evaluating functional status 1 year after inpatient non-cardiac surgery?
Effect estimate: Spearman's rho 0.45 (95% CI 0.30-0.52)
The WHODAS 2.0 questionnaire demonstrates construct validity and responsiveness for measuring functional status 1 year after major non-cardiac surgery.
Supports WHODAS 2.0 for post-surgical functional assessment; leaves open prospective validation in broader cohorts.
BACKGROUND: Expert recommendations propose the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 as a core outcome measure in surgical studies, yet data on its long-term measurement properties remain limited. These were evaluated in a secondary analysis of the Measurement of Exercise Tolerance before Surgery (METS) prospective cohort. METHODS: Participants were adults (40 years of age or older) who underwent inpatient non-cardiac surgery. The 12-item WHODAS and EQ-5DTM-3L questionnaires were administered preoperatively (in person) and 1 year postoperatively (by telephone). Responsiveness was characterized using standardized response means (SRMs) and correlation coefficients between change scores. Construct validity was evaluated using correlation coefficients between 1-year scores and comparisons of WHODAS scores across clinically relevant subgroups. RESULTS: The analysis included 546 patients. There was moderate correlation between changes in WHODAS and various EQ-5DTM subscales. The strongest correlation was between changes in WHODAS and changes in the functional domains of the EQ-5D-3L-for example, mobility (Spearman's rho 0.40, 95 per cent confidence interval [c.i.] 0.32 to 0.48) and usual activities (rho 0.45, 95 per cent c.i. 0.30 to 0.52). When compared across quartiles of EQ-5D index change, median WHODAS scores followed expected patterns of change. In subgroups with expected functional status changes, the WHODAS SRMs ranged from 'small' to 'large' in the expected directions of change. At 1 year, the WHODAS demonstrated convergence with the EQ-5D-3L functional domains, and good discrimination between patients with expected differences in functional status. CONCLUSION: The WHODAS questionnaire has construct validity and responsiveness as a measure of functional status at 1 year after major surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daza et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in inpatient non-cardiac surgery (n=546). WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 vs. EQ-5D-3L was evaluated on Correlation between changes in WHODAS and EQ-5D-3L functional domains (usual activities) (Spearman's rho 0.45, 95% CI 0.30-0.52). The WHODAS 2.0 questionnaire demonstrated construct validity and responsiveness, correlating with EQ-5D-3L usual activities (rho 0.45; 95% CI 0.30-0.52) at 1 year after major surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: