Key result
Renal denervation significantly reduced mean office systolic blood pressure by 26.4 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure by 8.8 mm Hg at 36 months compared to baseline in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension.
Why the study?
Clinical benefits of renal denervation remain under discussion because randomized controlled clinical studies have provided inconsistent results.
Does catheter-based radiofrequency renal denervation reduce blood pressure in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension?
Observational (n=50)
No
Does catheter-based radiofrequency renal denervation reduce blood pressure in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension?
Renal denervation provided a significant and sustained reduction in office blood pressure up to 36 months in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension, with no major adverse events but a slight increase in plasma creatinine.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support consideration in resistant hypertension with renal monitoring; extends observational data to 36 months but leaves open randomized confirmation.
The clinical benefits of renal denervation are still under discussion, since randomized controlled clinical studies have provided inconsistent results. The present retrospective study examined the clinical effects of renal denervation with focus on office blood pressure, heart rate, and changes in renal function. Patients with treatment-resistant hypertension (blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mm Hg in spite of 3 antihypertensive drugs including a diuretic) underwent renal denervation at the University Hospital of Zurich, Switzerland and were followed up until 36 months. Renal denervation was performed using 3 different renal denervation systems. The primary outcome consisted of change in office blood pressure, heart rate, and plasma creatinine at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after renal denervation. 58 patients underwent renal denervation between August 2010 and December 2017. After exclusion, 50 patients were included in the analyses. At 36 months, the mean office systolic and diastolic blood pressure change was -26.4/-8.8 mm Hg (95% CI: -34.6 to -18.2/-13.5 to -4.2 mm Hg; P < .001 for both). Office heart rate showed no significant change during follow-up (P = .361). Plasma creatinine increased from 90.6 µmol/L (95% CI: 82.1 to 99.0 µmol/L) at baseline to 102.1 µmol/L (95% CI: 95.8 to 108.3 µmol/L) at 36 months (P = .007). No major adverse events occurred. Renal denervation is a safe and effective procedure for patients with treatment-resistant hypertension with a clinically significant antihypertensive effect. Further randomized trials are needed to determine the specific context within which renal denervation should be considered a therapeutic option in antihypertensive care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naduvathumuriyil et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Treatment-resistant hypertension (n=50). Renal denervation vs. Baseline was evaluated on Change in office systolic blood pressure at 36 months (MD -26.4 mm Hg, 95% CI -34.6 to -18.2, p=<.001). Renal denervation significantly reduced mean office systolic blood pressure by 26.4 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure by 8.8 mm Hg at 36 months compared to baseline in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: