Key result
Ivabradine achieved complete rhythm control within 24 hours in 80% (12 of 15) of pediatric patients with congenital heart disease and focal atrial tachycardia.
Why the study?
Experience with ivabradine in pediatric patients, particularly those with congenital heart disease and focal atrial tachycardia, remains limited.
Does ivabradine improve rhythm control in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease and focal atrial tachycardia?
Observational (n=15)
No
Does ivabradine improve rhythm control in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease and focal atrial tachycardia?
Ivabradine demonstrated an 80% response rate for treating focal atrial tachycardia in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease, though transient bradycardia was common.
Background Ivabradine is a promising anti-arrhythmic therapy for automatic arrhythmias such as inappropriate sinus tachycardia, junctional ectopic tachycardia, and focal atrial tachycardia (AT). However, experience with ivabradine in pediatric patients, especially those with congenital heart disease (CHD) and focal AT, remains limited. We report our findings using ivabradine for focal AT in infants and children with CHD to assess its efficacy and safety. Method A retrospective analysis was conducted on all pediatric patients (<21 years) diagnosed with CHD at Children’s Health of Dallas, who were treated with ivabradine for focal AT. Patient demographics, arrhythmia diagnosis, anti-arrhythmic therapies, and adverse effects were evaluated. A positive response was defined as complete rhythm control within 24 hours of initiation of ivabradine. Results Fifteen patients (median age 7 [1-8] months; 9 males (60%)) were included in this study, including 12 (80%) complex CHD. Fourteen patients (93%) had unifocal AT and one (7%) had multifocal AT. The AT occurred in the early post-operative period in six patients (40%). In two patients (13%) ivabradine was used as monotherapy. Positive response to ivabradine was observed in 12 patients (80%). Adverse events occurred in 7 patients (47%) consisting of bradycardic, which was transient, or resolved upon reducing the ivabradine dosage. Conclusion In infants and children with CHD, ivabradine was efficacious for the treatment of focal AT without major complications. Bradycardia is a frequent adverse event. Therefore, close monitoring may be required during initiation of therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tolani et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Focal atrial tachycardia in congenital heart disease (n=15). Ivabradine was evaluated on Positive response (complete rhythm control within 24 hours of initiation). Ivabradine achieved complete rhythm control within 24 hours in 80% (12 of 15) of pediatric patients with congenital heart disease and focal atrial tachycardia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: