Key result
Digital microvascular reactivity, measured by the reactive hyperemia index, did not decline with impaired renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease.
Why the study?
The study aimed to explore the relation of the reactive hyperemia index to renal function and its association with traditional cardiovascular risk factors in patients with chronic kidney disease.
Does digital microvascular reactivity (RHI) decline with impaired renal function in patients with non-dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=252)
No
Does digital microvascular reactivity (RHI) decline with impaired renal function in patients with non-dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease?
Digital microvascular reactivity, measured by reactive hyperemia index, does not decline with reduced renal function in non-dialysis CKD patients and has only a modest association with systolic blood pressure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No significant RHI decline with renal impairment in non-dialysis CKD; hypothesis-generating for microvascular assessment and requires prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: The reactive hyperemia index (RHI), measured by peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT), is a novel measurement of endothelial function and has been proven to be valuable in cardiovascular risk stratification in several populations. The current study aims to explore its relation to renal function and its association with traditional cardiovascular risk factors in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: Subjects with non-dialysis dependent CKD were recruited and 252 of them had a successful PAT test. In addition to general demographic and medical information, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), carotid-radial pulse wave velocity (crPWV) and augmentation index (AIx) were recorded. RESULTS: The mean age of the study population was 57.7 (±14.7) years and 155 (61.5%) were males. The average RHI was 1.92 (±14.7) with no difference noted between males and females. There was no statistically significant correlation between RHI and eGFR (r = - 0.107, p = 0.089) or urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (r = 0.036, p = 0.570). With adjustment for age and sex, RHI was associated with systolic blood pressure (BP) (β = 0.006, p = 0.001), diastolic BP (β = 0.008, p = 0.010), heart rate (β = - 0.007, p = 0.015) crPWV (β = 0.037, p = 0.022) and AIx (β = 0.006, p = 0.001), but not with cfPWV or any other conventional risk factors analyzed. Systolic BP remained the only predictor for RHI in the stepwise regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: RHI did not decline with reduced renal function in CKD patients and had a modest association with traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Further studies are warranted to determine if RHI could predict cardiovascular outcome in CKD patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Chronic kidney disease (n=252). Impaired renal function (eGFR) was evaluated on Correlation between reactive hyperemia index (RHI) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (r = -0.107, p=0.089). Digital microvascular reactivity, measured by the reactive hyperemia index, did not decline with impaired renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: