Key result
In dogs treated with parenteral furosemide for congestive heart failure, kidney injury occurred in 48% of cases but did not impact survival, with higher PO furosemide dosage increasing the risk of kidney injury after discharge (OR 7.77).
Why the study?
Kidney injury has been documented in dogs treated with furosemide for left-sided congestive heart failure, but risk factors and its effect on survival required determination.
Does parenteral furosemide treatment cause kidney injury and affect survival in dogs with left-sided congestive heart failure?
Cohort (n=79)
No
Does parenteral furosemide treatment cause kidney injury and affect survival in dogs with left-sided congestive heart failure?
In dogs receiving parenteral furosemide for left-sided congestive heart failure, kidney injury is common but mostly mild and does not negatively impact long-term survival.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AKI during parenteral furosemide does not affect survival in canine CHF; leaves open optimal PO dosing to reduce post-discharge risk.
BACKGROUND: Kidney injury (KI) has been documented in dogs treated with furosemide for left-sided congestive heart failure (CHF). HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: Determine risk factors for development of KI in furosemide-treated dogs and determine the effect of KI on survival. ANIMALS: Seventy-nine client-owned dogs receiving parenteral furosemide for CHF. METHODS: Serum creatinine (sCr) and electrolyte concentrations were determined during hospitalization and at first outpatient reevaluation to detect and stage KI (increase in sCr ≥0.3 mg/dL). Furosemide dosage administered between timepoints was calculated. Multivariable modeling was performed to identify predictors of KI and percent change in serum biochemistry results over time. RESULTS: Kidney injury was identified in 38/79 (48%) dogs and mostly occurred during hospitalization. Kidney injury was Grade I in 25 dogs, Grade II in 9 dogs, and Grade III in 4 dogs. Higher blood pressure was associated with acute KI during hospitalization (odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.01-1.07; P = .03) whereas PO furosemide dosage was associated with KI after hospital discharge (odds ratio, 7.77; 95% CI, 2.05-68.6; P = .02). Baseline sCr and use of a furosemide continuous rate infusion were not associated with increased risk of KI. Kidney injury was not associated with long-term outcome. Of 13 dogs with Grade II-III KI, azotemia was reversible in 9 dogs, and 6 dogs survived >1 year after KI. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: In this cohort of dogs receiving parenteral furosemide for CHF, KI was common, mostly nonazotemic (Grade I), and did not impact survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giorgi et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Left-sided congestive heart failure (n=79). Parenteral furosemide was evaluated on Kidney injury after hospital discharge associated with PO furosemide dosage (OR 7.77, 95% CI 2.05-68.6, p=.02). In dogs treated with parenteral furosemide for congestive heart failure, kidney injury occurred in 48% of cases but did not impact survival, with higher PO furosemide dosage increasing the risk of kidney injury after discharge (OR 7.77).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: