Key result
Subcutaneous fat thickness assessed by ultrasonography was independently and inversely associated with carotid intima-media thickness in men with type 2 diabetes (beta = -0.004, p < 0.001), but not in women.
Why the study?
Does subcutaneous abdominal fat thickness correlate with carotid atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Cross-Sectional (n=234)
No
Does subcutaneous abdominal fat thickness correlate with carotid atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Effect estimate: beta = -0.004 (95% CI -0.005 to -0.002)
p-value: p=<0.001
Subcutaneous abdominal fat thickness measured by ultrasonography is inversely associated with carotid atherosclerosis in men with type 2 diabetes, suggesting a potential protective role or different metabolic profile compared to visceral fat.
Should not yet inform atherosclerosis risk assessment in T2DM; leaves open sex-specific protective associations for prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Whereas visceral abdominal adipose tissue (VAT) is associated with cardiometabolic risk, there is debate regarding the role of subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue (SAT). The aim of this study was to investigate the relationships of subcutaneous and visceral abdominal fat with carotid atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: A total of 234 patients (men 131, women 103, mean age: 53 years) with T2DM were enrolled. Carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT) and visceral fat thickness (VFT) were assessed by high-resolution B-mode ultrasonography (US). RESULTS: Compared to women, men had significantly higher VFT and lower SFT (p = 0.002, p = 0.04, respectively). In partial correlation coefficient analyses between CIMT and abdominal fat thickness after adjustment for body mass index (BMI), SFT showed a negative correlation with CIMT in men (r = -0.27, p = 0.03). VFT was not correlated with CIMT in either men or women. In women, SFT was not correlated with CIMT (r = -0.01, p = 0.93). VFT/SFT ratio was not correlated with CIMT in either men or women. In multivariate regression analyses adjusted for BMI and other CVD risk factors, SFT but not VFT was independently inversely associated with CIMT in men but not in women (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SFT assessed by US was inversely associated with carotid atherosclerosis in patients with T2DM, particularly men. Further research into the different roles of the two types of abdominal adipose tissue in both men and women is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jung et al. (2014) conducted a cross-sectional in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=234). Subcutaneous abdominal fat thickness (SFT) was evaluated on Carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) (beta = -0.004, 95% CI -0.005 to -0.002, p=<0.001). Subcutaneous fat thickness assessed by ultrasonography was independently and inversely associated with carotid intima-media thickness in men with type 2 diabetes (beta = -0.004, p < 0.001), but not in women.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: