Key result
A 14-week training program of Nordic hamstring and sprint exercises reduced hamstring injury burden compared to control (3.82 vs 27.87 absence days/1000 h; RR 7.30, 95% CI 3.34-15.99).
Why the study?
The study evaluated the effects of a training program based on Nordic hamstring and sprint exercises on physical performance and hamstring injuries in young male soccer players.
Does a training program based on Nordic hamstring and sprint exercises improve physical performance and reduce hamstring injuries in U19 male soccer players?
RCT (n=49)
Randomly assigned
Does a training program based on Nordic hamstring and sprint exercises improve physical performance and reduce hamstring injuries in U19 male soccer players?
Relative Risk: 7.3 (95% CI 3.34–15.99)
Absolute Event Rate: 3.82% vs 27.87%
A 14-week training program based on Nordic hamstring and sprint exercises improves sprint performance and reduces hamstring injury burden in U19 male soccer players.
Supports adding Nordic hamstring and sprint exercises to U19 soccer training; extends RCT evidence for hamstring injury prevention.
This study analysed the effects of a training program based on Nordic hamstring and sprint exercises on physical performance and hamstring injuries in young male soccer players. Forty-nine U19 players were randomly assigned to a control (CG; n = 26) or experimental group (EG; n = 23). Linear sprint and with change of direction (COD) were assessed before and after a 14-week training period. Hamstring injuries were collected during the intervention period. Between-groups analysis revealed differences in linear sprint performance (p = 0.012–0.001) in favour of the EG. Pre-to-post performance increased significantly in the EG for 20 m (effect size [ES] = −0.56) and 30 m (ES = −0.62) sprints, but a significant reduction in some COD parameters was observed (ES = 0.45–0.57). In CG, only a significant reduction in COD with dominant leg was found (ES = 0.63). Significant differences in injury burden in favour of the EG was reported such as (27.87 [CG] vs. 3.82 [EG] absence days/1000 h of exposure, rate ratio = 7.30, 95% CI 3.34–15.99). While injury incidence was not different between the EG and CG. These findings suggest that the training program implemented can improve sprint performance and reduce injury burden.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raya‐González et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Hamstring injury prevention (n=49). Training program based on Nordic hamstring and sprint exercises vs. Control was evaluated on Hamstring injury burden (absence days/1000 h of exposure) (RR 7.30, 95% CI 3.34-15.99). A 14-week training program of Nordic hamstring and sprint exercises reduced hamstring injury burden compared to control (3.82 vs 27.87 absence days/1000 h; RR 7.30, 95% CI 3.34-15.99).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: