Key result
Intravenous cangrelor use during acute neuroendovascular procedures was associated with a 44% rate of favorable functional outcomes at 90 days and a 6% rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.
Why the study?
The optimal antiplatelet therapy regimen for certain neuroendovascular procedures remains unclear.
Is intravenous dose-adjusted cangrelor safe and feasible in patients undergoing acute neuroendovascular interventions?
Observational (n=76)
Yes
Is intravenous dose-adjusted cangrelor safe and feasible in patients undergoing acute neuroendovascular interventions?
Intravenous cangrelor appears safe and effective for acute neuroendovascular procedures, demonstrating low rates of bleeding and ischemic events.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support cangrelor feasibility in neuroendovascular procedures; leaves open need for RCTs to confirm safety.
Background The optimal antiplatelet therapy regimen for certain neuroendovascular procedures remains unclear. This study investigates the safety and feasibility of intravenous dose-adjusted cangrelor in patients undergoing acute neuroendovascular interventions. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of all consecutive patients on intravenous cangrelor for neuroendovascular procedures between September 1, 2020, and March 13, 2022. We also conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase and the Cochrane Library up to February 22, 2023. Results In our cohort, a total of 76 patients were included [mean age (years): 57.2 ± 18.2, males: 39 (51.3), Black: 49 (64.5)]. Cangrelor was most used for embolization and intracranial stent placement ( n = 24, 32%). Approximately 44% of our patients had a favorable outcome with a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 to 2 at 90 days ( n = 25/57); within 1 year, 8% of patients had recurrent or new strokes ( n = 5/59), 6% had symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage [sICH] (4/64), 3% had major extracranial bleeding events (2/64), and 3% had a gastrointestinal bleed (2/64). In our meta-analysis, 11 studies with 298 patients were included. The pooled proportion of sICH and intraprocedural thromboembolic complication events were 0.07 [95% CI 0.04 to 1.13] and 0.08 [95% CI 0.05 to 0.15], respectively. Conclusion Our study found that intravenous cangrelor appears to be safe and effective in neuroendovascular procedures, with low rates of bleeding and ischemic events. However, further research is needed to compare different dosing and titration protocols of cangrelor and other intravenous agents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Desai et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Neuroendovascular procedures (n=76). Intravenous cangrelor was evaluated on Favorable functional outcome (mRS 0-2) at 90 days. Intravenous cangrelor use during acute neuroendovascular procedures was associated with a 44% rate of favorable functional outcomes at 90 days and a 6% rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: