Why the study?
Does high hospital volume of throughput reduce periprocedural and medium-term adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention?
Does high hospital volume of throughput reduce periprocedural and medium-term adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention?
High hospital PCI volume is not associated with a difference in death or MI, but is associated with a lower risk of emergency surgery compared to low-volume hospitals.
High-volume PCI hospitals were associated with lower emergency surgery risk but similar death/MI rates; leaves open whether volume-based referral improves outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) hospital volume of throughput is associated with periprocedural and medium-term events, and whether any associations are independent of differences in case mix. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of all PCIs undertaken in Scottish National Health Service hospitals over a six-year period. METHODS: All PCIs in Scotland during 1997-2003 were examined. Linkage to administrative databases identified events over two years' follow up. The risk of events by hospital volume at 30 days and two years was compared by using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Of the 17,417 PCIs, 4900 (28%) were in low-volume hospitals and 3242 (19%) in high-volume hospitals. After adjustment for case mix, there were no significant differences in risk of death or myocardial infarction. Patients treated in high-volume hospitals were less likely to require emergency surgery (adjusted odds ratio 0.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07 to 0.54, p = 0.002). Over two years, patients in high-volume hospitals were less likely to undergo surgery (adjusted hazard ratio 0.52, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.75, p = 0.001), but this was offset by an increased likelihood of further PCI. There was no net difference in coronary revascularisation or in overall events. CONCLUSION: Death and myocardial infarction were infrequent complications of PCI and did not differ significantly by volume. Emergency surgery was less common in high-volume hospitals. Over two years, patients treated in high-volume centres were as likely to undergo some form of revascularisation but less likely to undergo surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burton et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: