Case Report (n=1)
CT imaging is crucial for diagnosing subacute right ventricular perforation by a pacemaker lead in patients with subtle clinical presentations and non-corroborative device interrogation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CT may aid diagnosis of subacute RV perforation despite normal device interrogation; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Subacute right ventricular perforation by a pacemaker lead is a rare complication. Although occasionally asymptomatic, complicated cases are usually evidently symptomatic. Here, we report a 70-year-old man presented with mild left-sided chest pain three days after permanent pacemaker implantation. Suspected of ventricular perforation by the pacemaker lead on chest X-ray, device interrogation revealed non-corroborative parameters. This warranted a computed tomography (CT) scan, which confirmed the diagnosis, detected hemopneumothorax, and helped plan surgical intervention. The patient underwent surgical management with the placement of an epicardial pacemaker lead and was discharged after five days. Our case illustrates a rare report of subtle clinical presentation in a patient with subacute right ventricular perforation by a pacemaker lead complicated by hemopneumothorax. It further recapitulates the role of CT scan in providing definitive diagnostic information in managing such a patient. Anticipation of such a presentation is essential for primary care physicians, who are often a first contact point for a patient in the community. This requires a high index of suspicion in such patients presenting with minimal symptoms. Early recognition and timely referral by a family physician may prevent untoward consequences of device-related complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Otaal et al. (2022) conducted a case report in Subacute right ventricular perforation by a pacemaker lead (n=1). Surgical exploration and epicardial pacemaker lead placement was evaluated on Clinical recovery and pacemaker function.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: