Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Since late 1998, a Franco-British engine has driven remarkable progress in European defence. Continued progress, however, will depend on a basic agreement on ultimate goals between the leading partners. Are the French and the British really on the same wavelength? Are their visions for ESDP equally compatible with a strengthened and re-balanced Alliance? While London and Paris have successfully married their policies for the short-term, it is unclear whether, in the longer term, their strategic ambitions can be reconciled. France wants to promote a European project (ESDP) by using an Atlanticist instrument (NATO). The UK aims first and foremost to preserve the cohesion of the Alliance, by using a European instrument (ESDP). The compatibility of these aims in the long term will depend on the evolution of the Alliance itself. Without genuine mutual understanding and a clear common purpose - particularly between London and Paris - the Alliance could begin to unravel.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jolyon Howorth (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: