Why the study?
The study aimed to describe the clinical epidemiology and 1-year outcomes of outpatients and inpatients with HF in Tunisian cardiology centers.
Observational (n=2,040)
Yes
Acute heart failure in the Tunisian population remains associated with high 1-year mortality (22.8%), highlighting the need for improved management and guideline-directed medical therapy optimization.
Warrants attention to acute HF presentations in similar cohorts; hypothesis-generating for GDMT optimization trials in North African populations.
The NATURE-HF registry was aimed to describe clinical epidemiology and 1-year outcomes of outpatients and inpatients with heart failure (HF). This is a prospective, multicenter, observational survey conducted in Tunisian Cardiology centers. A total of 2040 patients were included in the study. Of these, 1632 (80%) were outpatients with chronic HF (CHF). The mean hospital stay was 8.7 ± 8.2 days. The mortality rate during the initial hospitalization event for AHF was 7.4%. The all-cause 1-year mortality rate was 22.8% among AHF patients and 10.6% among CHF patients. Among CHF patients, the older age, diabetes, anemia, reduced EF, ischemic etiology, residual congestion and the absence of ACEI/ ARBs treatment were independent predictors of 1-year cumulative rates of rehospitalization and mortality. The female sex and the functional status were independent predictors of 1-year all-cause mortality and rehospitalization in AHF patients. This study confirmed that acute HF is still associated with a poor prognosis, while the mid-term outcomes in patients with chronic HF seems to be improved. Some differences across countries may be due to different clinical characteristics and differences in healthcare systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abid et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=2,040). Acute heart failure vs. Chronic heart failure was evaluated on 1-year all-cause mortality (p=<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: