Key result
Artificial gravity time-to-presyncope tests showed high repeatability over 7 months in male participants (LCCC = 0.98) but not in female participants (LCCC = -0.64).
Why the study?
It was unknown how long before spaceflight analog testing artificial gravity orthostatic tolerance data would remain valid to determine countermeasure efficacy.
Is the time to presyncope during artificial gravity orthostatic tolerance testing repeatable over a 7-month period in healthy volunteers?
Observational (n=7)
No
Is the time to presyncope during artificial gravity orthostatic tolerance testing repeatable over a 7-month period in healthy volunteers?
Effect estimate: LCCC 0.98 for males, -0.64 for females
Artificial gravity tolerance time testing using a short-arm centrifuge is highly repeatable over a 7-month period in healthy males, but further study is needed to understand the variability in females.
May support sex-specific protocols for artificial gravity testing; leaves open reliability in females and clinical translation.
Introduction: Exposure to microgravity results in physiological deconditioning, including orthostatic intolerance. Artificial gravity (AG) from short-arm centrifuges is being tested in ground-based studies to counter these effects. Orthostatic tolerance testing with centrifuges before and after these spaceflight analogs could determine the efficacy of an AG countermeasure to orthostatic tolerance. However, there has not been an investigation on how long before analog testing AG orthostatic tolerance data would remain valid for such a study. Methods: A secondary analysis of two experiments involving AG orthostatic tolerance testing (starting at 0.6 for females and 0.8 Gz for males and increased by 0.1 Gz every 3 minutes until presyncope) conducted 7 months apart at MEDES revealed 4 male and 3 female participants who had taken part in both. Results: Comparisons of participants' time to presyncope between the two tests using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (LCCC) showed a significant relationship in time to presyncope between the two test dates (LCCC = 0.98) for males but not for females (LCCC = -0.64). While the cardiovascular data from one female was unusable, the mean heart rate responses to increasing artificial gravity during the orthostatic tolerance procedure showed a strong linear correlation between the two tests for all other participants (all p < 0.008). The LCCC heart rate changes with centrifuge level varied across male participants from 0.61 to 0.97, suggesting that the high LCCC for time to presyncope was achieved with varied HR baselines between the two test dates. Discussion: These findings indicate that time-to-presyncope tests may remain valid up to 7 months after the testing date for males. We highly recommend further study with larger numbers of male and female participants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stead et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Healthy volunteers (n=7). Artificial gravity orthostatic tolerance testing was evaluated on Repeatability of time to presyncope (Lin's concordance correlation coefficient) (LCCC 0.98 for males, -0.64 for females). Artificial gravity time-to-presyncope tests showed high repeatability over 7 months in male participants (LCCC = 0.98) but not in female participants (LCCC = -0.64).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: