Key result
Patients with gastrointestinal bleeding from dabigatran received significantly fewer packed red blood cell transfusions compared to those on warfarin (0.69 vs. 1.92 units, p=0.024), with similar clinical outcomes.
Why the study?
Does dabigatran compared with warfarin reduce blood transfusion requirements and improve clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized for gastrointestinal bleeding?
Population
39 patients hospitalized for gastrointestinal bleeding who were taking either dabigatran or warfarin for…
Comparison
Dabigatran for non-valvular atrial fibrillation vs Warfarin with therapeutic international…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
Hospitalization period (mean length of stay 5.6 to 5.9 days)
Authors
Loading...
Dabigatran-associated GI bleeding linked to fewer transfusions; leaves open whether severity differs or reflects confounding in this cohort.
Observational (n=39)
No
Does dabigatran compared with warfarin reduce blood transfusion requirements and improve clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized for gastrointestinal bleeding?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.69% vs 1.92%
p-value: p=0.024
In patients hospitalized for GI bleeding, those anticoagulated with dabigatran required significantly fewer blood transfusions compared to those on warfarin, with similar overall clinical outcomes and length of stay.
Manatsathit et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Gastrointestinal bleeding (n=39). Dabigatran vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Number of transfused packed red blood cells (PRBCs) (p=0.024). Patients with gastrointestinal bleeding from dabigatran received significantly fewer packed red blood cell transfusions compared to those on warfarin (0.69 vs. 1.92 units, p=0.024), with similar clinical outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: