Key result
Among naïve dabigatran users, the incidence rate of gastrointestinal bleeding was similar during the dabigatran risk period compared to the non-exposed period.
Why the study?
Does dabigatran increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding compared to non-exposure or warfarin in adult patients?
Observational (n=1,215)
Yes
Does dabigatran increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding compared to non-exposure or warfarin in adult patients?
In a real-world cohort of commercially insured adults, dabigatran use was not associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding compared to non-use or warfarin use.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No increased GI bleeding risk seen with dabigatran; hypothesis-generating and should not change practice.
This article aims to evaluate the real world risk of gastrointestinal bleeding among users naïve to dabigatran. We adopted a self-controlled case series design. We sampled 1215 eligible adult participants who were continuous insured users between July 1, 2010 and March 31, 2012 with use of dabigatran and at least one gastrointestinal bleeding episode. We used a conditional Poisson regression to estimate incidence rate ratios. The population consisted of 64.69% of male and 60.25% patients equal to or greater than age 65 at start of observation. After adjustment for time-variant confounders, the incidence rate of gastrointestinal bleeding was similar during dabigatran risk period and non-exposed period (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90, 1.15). There was no significant difference in GI incidence rate between periods of dabigatran and warfarin (IRR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.75-1.31). Among this database of young and healthy participants, dabigatran was not associated with increased incidence rate of GI bleeding compared with non-exposed period among naïve dabigatran users. We did not detect an increased risk of GI bleeding over dabigatran vs warfarin risk period. Along with other studies on safety and effectiveness, this study should help clinicians choose the appropriate anticoagulant for their patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Gastrointestinal bleeding (n=1,215). Dabigatran vs. Non-exposed period was evaluated on Incidence rate of gastrointestinal bleeding (IRR 1.01, 95% CI 0.90-1.15). Among naïve dabigatran users, the incidence rate of gastrointestinal bleeding was similar during the dabigatran risk period compared to the non-exposed period.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: