Why the study?
To address what combination antithrombotic therapy is recommended for patients with atrial fibrillation with acute coronary syndrome or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Does double therapy with clopidogrel and DOACs reduce bleeding compared to triple therapy or warfarin-based therapies in patients with atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Does double therapy with clopidogrel and DOACs reduce bleeding compared to triple therapy or warfarin-based therapies in patients with atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Double therapy with a DOAC and clopidogrel is recommended as a safe and effective alternative to triple therapy for most patients with AF undergoing PCI or with ACS, due to reduced bleeding risk.
What is the clinical question? What combination antithrombotic therapy is recommended for patients with atrial fibrillation with acute coronary syndrome or patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention? 2. What does the evidence say? Double therapy (DT) with clopidogrel and direct oral anticoagulants (specifically, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban) is noninferior to warfarin-based therapies for most patients. Double therapy is noninferior to triple therapy (TT) and has less bleeding complications. 3. What is the take-home message for physicians? According to the latest guidelines by the ACC, AHA, ESC, and HRS, in patients with AF undergoing PCI, DT with DOACs (specifically dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban) plus clopidogrel is acceptable. Patients undergoing PCI or with high ischemic risk may still benefit from TT for at least 1 month and up to 6 months before switching to DT. Currently, there is no specific guidance on long-term antiplatelet therapy in these patients. Duration of antiplatelet therapy, whether with DT or TT, should be based on current DAPT guidelines (depending on indication and type of intervention) and discussions with each patient's cardiologist.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tseng et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: