Why the study?
Does vasodilator-induced stress compared to exercise stress impair left ventricular function obtained with gated SPECT in patients with known or suspected CAD?
Does vasodilator-induced stress compared to exercise stress impair left ventricular function obtained with gated SPECT in patients with known or suspected CAD?
Vasodilator stress independently decreases left ventricular ejection fraction and increases ventricular volumes on gated SPECT, indicating that transient ischemic dilatation must be interpreted cautiously when vasodilators are used.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant cautious gated-SPECT LVEF and TID interpretation after vasodilators; leaves open prospective validation in CAD.
BACKGROUND: Transient ischemic dilatation (TID) and post-stress dysfunction of the left ventricle (LV) are important markers of severe coronary artery disease (CAD). To clarify the effects of stressor type on TID and post-stress LV dysfunction, changes in LV measurements were compared between patients with exercise- or vasodilator-induced stress. METHODS AND RESULTS: The 689 patients referred for technetium-99m tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion imaging were included. Patients were stressed with either a vasodilator (n=236) or exercise (n=453). LV measurements were obtained with ECG-gated SPECT. LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volume indexes (LVEDVI, LVESVI) increased and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) decreased after stress in the vasodilator-stress group. Vasodilator-stress and the summed difference score (SDS) were independent variables that decreased LVEF after stress. Even in patients without reversible defects, vasodilator-stress impaired LV function. There were no differences in the stress-to-rest ratios of LVEDVI (rEDV) and LVESVI (rESV) among patients with normal myocardial perfusion, fixed defects and reversible defects in the vasodilator-stress group, whereas in the exercise-stress group, rESV was significantly higher in the patients with reversible defects than in those without reversible defects. Within the vasodilator-stress group, neither rEDV nor rESV correlated with the SDS. CONCLUSIONS: Vasodilator-stress by itself decreases LVEF after stress. TID should be carefully interpreted when vasodilator-stress is used to detect severe CAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Odagiri et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: