Why the study?
Does poststress ejection fraction assessed by ECG-gated myocardial perfusion SPECT predict future acute coronary syndrome in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease?
Does poststress ejection fraction assessed by ECG-gated myocardial perfusion SPECT predict future acute coronary syndrome in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease?
The combination of significant myocardial ischemia and low poststress ejection fraction on ECG-gated SPECT provides incremental prognostic value for predicting future acute coronary syndrome.
May refine ACS risk stratification via combined gated-SPECT ischemia and poststress EF; extends observational data but leaves prospective validation open.
BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of ECG-gated rest 201Tl/stress 99mTc-tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of acute coronary syndrome (ACS: myocardial infarction (MI) and unstable angina (UA)) and the implications of ejection fraction (EF) has not yet been defined in Japanese. METHODS AND RESULTS: The 1,895 patients were followed up for the occurrence ACS. The mean follow-up interval was 26.9+/-15.5 months. The 142 patients with revascularization within 60 days were censored. Summed stress score (SSS) and summed difference score (SDS) were calculated. The 19 MI and 29 UA occurred (1.1% and 1.6%, respectively). Univariate Cox analysis showed that hypertension (Wald 5.09, p<0.05), poststress EF (Wald 10.9, p<0.01), SSS (Wald 12.4, p<0.001) and SDS (Wald 18.7, p<0.001) were significant predictors of ACS. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that hypertension (Wald 4.27, p<0.05) and SDS (Wald 8.59, p<0.01) were independent predictors. When multiple clinical risk factors (number of coronary risk factors > or =2), significant ischemia (SDS > or =4) and low EF (EF <45%) were applied to multivariate Cox analysis, the combination of significant ischemia and low EF showed the highest predictive value (Wald 11.9; p<0.001) for future ACS. CONCLUSION: Poststress EF added incremental prognostic value for the prediction of ACS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matsumoto et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: