Why the study?
Individuals with abnormal glucose metabolism are at higher risk for heart failure, but strategies for early identification in this population remain inadequate.
Does a protein-panel-clinical-factors (PPCF) model improve the prediction of incident heart failure compared to clinical factors alone in individuals with abnormal glucose metabolism?
Does a protein-panel-clinical-factors (PPCF) model improve the prediction of incident heart failure compared to clinical factors alone in individuals with abnormal glucose metabolism?
A predictive model incorporating four plasma proteins (NTproBNP, LTBP2, REN, GDF15) alongside clinical factors significantly improves the prediction of incident heart failure in individuals with abnormal glucose metabolism.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports protein-enhanced HF prediction in abnormal glucose metabolism; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
AIMS: Individuals with abnormal glucose metabolism are at a significantly higher risk of developing heart failure (HF). However, strategies for early identification of HF in this high-risk population remain inadequate. This study aimed to identify plasma protein biomarkers associated with HF development and construct predictive models to identify at-risk individuals. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed HF development in abnormal glucose metabolism population using data from 6517 participants in discovery cohort and 2783 in validation cohort, all from the UK Biobank, with no prior history of HF. Proteomic profiling was performed, and Lasso-Cox regression was used to identify protein associations, followed by Cox regression to develop predictive models. The model incorporated four proteins (NTproBNP, LTBP2, REN, GDF15) and clinical factors to create a protein-panel-clinical-factors (PPCF) model. For comparison, the model's performance was also evaluated in individuals with normal glucose metabolism. Over a median follow-up of 13.90 years, 555 incident HF cases were recorded in discovery cohort. The PPCF model achieved an AUC of 0.823 (95% CI: 0.785-0.860) in validation cohort, improving predictive performance by 0.05 (P < 0.001) compared with clinical factors-only model. In general population of 23 107 individuals, PPCF model obtained an AUC of 0.807 (95% CI: 0.786-0.829). Both protein panel model and PPCF model demonstrated superior net benefits over clinical factors model in abnormal glucose metabolism population. CONCLUSION: This study identified plasma protein biomarkers linked to HF development in abnormal glucose metabolism population and established the predictive models. These findings support early identification in high-risk populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: