Why the study?
Does two-dimensional strain and strain rate assessed by Velocity Vector Imaging accurately detect regional left ventricular function and scarring in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction?
Does two-dimensional strain and strain rate assessed by Velocity Vector Imaging accurately detect regional left ventricular function and scarring in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction?
Two-dimensional strain and strain rate assessed by Velocity Vector Imaging can effectively quantify regional myocardial function and identify infarcted segments after acute anterior myocardial infarction.
May aid VVI strain assessment of regional LV function post-anterior MI; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
AIMS: Strain rate imaging techniques have been proposed for the detection of ischemic or viable myocardium in coronary artery disease, which is still a challenge in clinical cardiology. This retrospective comparative study analyzed regional left ventricular function and scaring with two-dimensional strain (2DS) in the first 4 to 10 days after acute anterior myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population consisted of 32 AMI patients with an LAD occlusion and successful reperfusion. The assessment of peak systolic 2DS and peak systolic strain rate (SR) was performed segment-oriented with the angle-independent speckle tracking algorithm Velocity Vector Imaging (VVI). The infarcted, adjacent and non-infarcted segments were revealed by late enhancement MRI (LE-MRI), which was used as reference for the comparison with 2DS. The infarcted segments showed a significant decrease of tissue velocities, 2DS and SR in comparison to the non-affected segments. CONCLUSION: 2DS and SR as assessed by VVI seem to be a suitable approach for echocardiographic quantification of global and regional myocardial function as well as a promising tool for multimodal risk stratification after anterior AMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Butz et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: