Why the study?
Carotid plaque characteristics strongly influence stroke risk, but few studies have followed up patients evaluated with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.
Does the presence of ulceration on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography predict ipsilateral ischemic stroke recurrence or death in patients with medically treated carotid stenosis?
Does the presence of ulceration on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography predict ipsilateral ischemic stroke recurrence or death in patients with medically treated carotid stenosis?
The presence of ulceration detected by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in patients with medically treated carotid stenosis is associated with a significantly higher 1-year risk of ipsilateral ischemic stroke recurrence or death.
CEUS ulceration signals higher recurrence risk in medically managed carotid stenosis; hypothesis-generating for risk stratification, prospective validation needed.
Background: The characteristics of carotid plaque strongly influence the potential risk of stroke. However, few studies have followed up patients with carotid characteristics using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS). Objective and Methods: Between July 2015 and September 2017, we enrolled 50 patients with carotid stenosis who underwent carotid ultrasonography (CUS), CEUS, and black-blood magnetic resonance imaging (BB-MRI) to evaluate the carotid characteristics. We assessed the correlation between enhancement-positive, ulcer-positive, T1-high, and recurrence or ipsilateral ischemic stroke or death. Results: Of the 50 patients hospitalized for carotid stenosis, 8 (16%) developed recurrence of ipsilateral ischemic stroke or died in the first year of follow-up. In the ulcer-positive group, the recurrence or death rate was 35% (6/17) during the first year, which was statistically different from that in the ulcer-negative group (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Follow-up by CEUS in patients with ulcer-positive carotid plaque can provide valuable information regarding ipsilateral ischemic recurrences or death.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uemura et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: