Why the study?
Does lumbar skin warming increase gastric motility and blood pressure in healthy humans?
Does lumbar skin warming increase gastric motility and blood pressure in healthy humans?
Lumbar skin warming increases gastric contractility and systolic blood pressure in healthy humans, likely due to vasoconstriction of visceral arteries.
May increase gastric motility and SBP in healthy humans; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
We examined the possibility that lumbar skin warming can increase gastrointestinal motility by investigating the electrogastrogram (EGG), blood pressure, and heart rate with psychometric ratings in healthy humans. Scores of mood state profiles showed that lumbar skin warming (42 degrees C, 20 min) decreased tension-anxiety, depression, anger-hostility, fatigue, and confusion of the participants. A multiple bandpass filter analysis of EGGs showed that a postural transition from orthostatic to supine for measurement caused an increase in dominant frequency of 25-29% towards the frequencies of the normal interdigestive migrating motor complex (IMC). The spectral power of the IMC band, 2.55-3.05 cycles/min, was increased by 20 min-warming, reflecting the increase in gastric contractility. No increase in the spectral power was observed in the time-matched control group without skin warming. Therefore, an increase in contractility is a characteristic of lumbar skin warming. The systolic blood pressure increased by 15% during warm stimulation. Interbeat intervals were not influenced by warm stimulation. An analysis of interbeat intervals by a fast Fourier transform method showed that the cardiac sympathetic and parasympathetic nerves did not play a major role in raising the blood pressure. Vasoconstriction of the mesenteric artery was therefore considered to cause a blood pressure increase during warming. It is hypothesized that vasoconstriction of the visceral arteries by lumbar skin warming increases the blood pressure and gastrointestinal contractility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nagai et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: