Why the study?
Intravenous thrombolysis benefit is time-dependent and restricted by contraindications like anticoagulation, though advanced neuroimaging now extends therapeutic windows to 24 hours in selected patients.
Does intravenous rt-PA thrombolysis improve neurological outcomes in an acute ischemic stroke patient on rivaroxaban presenting outside the traditional time window?
Does intravenous rt-PA thrombolysis improve neurological outcomes in an acute ischemic stroke patient on rivaroxaban presenting outside the traditional time window?
Intravenous thrombolysis can be safely administered in selected acute ischemic stroke patients on DOACs presenting outside the traditional time window, guided by advanced neuroimaging and specific drug concentration levels.
May support IVT feasibility in selected DOAC patients beyond window; hypothesis-generating, needs prospective confirmation.
A stroke is a life-threatening medical condition that could be disabling if left untreated. Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) can be effective when initiated in an acute stroke, but their benefit is time-dependent and their use may be restricted by contraindications (CIs) such as anticoagulation therapy. The critical therapeutic time window, which was previously limited to 4.5-6 hours, is now extended to 24 hours in selected patients due to the development of advanced neuroimaging techniques. Herein, we discuss the case of a 50-year-old patient on rivaroxaban who developed acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and was treated successfully with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator thrombolysis more than six hours after the time he was last seen well (LSW). Our case demonstrates the importance of advanced neuroimaging techniques in identifying AIS candidates for IVT and/or MT with late or unknown time windows as well as the importance of case-by-case assessment when challenged by theoretical contraindications for thrombolysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moorthamers et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: