Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mixtures containing probiotic bacteria and a carbon source ( Lactobacillus amylovorus [LA] + yeast beta glucan [YBG]; Bacillus subtilis [BS] + wheat flour T55 [WF55]) were evaluated for their ability to modify the gut microbial activity and composition of two healthy human donors in vitro . in vitro Survival of both probiotic strains was shown throughout upper gastrointestinal transit, with the proportion of viable and culturable cells was being a respective 68.0% and 6.9% for LA and 39.9% and 13.1% for BS. Furthermore, after 3 weeks of supplementation with LA+YBG or BS+WT55 using the Mucosal Simulator of the Human Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem (M-SHIME®) model, significant butyrogenic effects were observed in the colonic environment (+33.1% and +73.2% across donors, respectively), likely due to stimulation of members of the Firmicutes phylum. Product-specific effects included significantly elevated acetate production for BS+WT55 (+43.0% across donors), and a consistent propiogenic effect for LA+YBG (+28.6% across donors). These effects could be linked with increased levels of Bifidobacterium spp., particularly Bifidobacterium adolescentis , and enhanced Bacteroides abundance, respectively. The two test mixtures thus demonstrated probiotic-like effects, indicating their potential for gut health. • Both probiotics survived upper GIT transit and sustained within the colonic regions • LA+YBG and BS+WF55 showed consistent and significant butyrogenic properties • LA+YBG specifically enhanced propionate by 28.6%, linked to Bacteroides enrichment • BS+WF55 specifically boosted acetate by 43.0%, driven by Bifidobacterium growth • Both product mixtures enhanced A. muciniphila levels in the distal colonic lumen
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duysburgh et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: