Why the study?
Endovascular treatments such as TEVAR and EVAR in hybrid operating room systems require fluoroscopic control, making patient radiation dose an important issue to evaluate.
What is the radiation dose received by patients undergoing TEVAR and EVAR in a hybrid operating room system?
What is the radiation dose received by patients undergoing TEVAR and EVAR in a hybrid operating room system?
TEVAR and EVAR performed in hybrid operating rooms result in substantial radiation doses, emphasizing the importance of dose optimization to prevent radiation-related injuries.
Substantial radiation exposure in TEVAR/EVAR warrants dose optimization in hybrid suites; this cohort study leaves open long-term risk assessment and technique refinement.
In recent years, endovascular treatment of aortic aneurysms has attracted considerable attention as a promising alternative to traditional surgery. Hybrid operating room systems (HORSs) are increasingly being used to perform endovascular procedures. The clinical benefits of endovascular treatments using HORSs are very clear, and these procedures are increasing in number. In procedures such as thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), wires and catheters are used to deliver and deploy the stent graft in the thoracic/abdominal aorta under fluoroscopic control, including DSA. Thus, the radiation dose to the patient is an important issue. We determined radiation dose indicators (the dose–area product (DAP) and air karma (AK) parameters) associated with endovascular treatments (EVAR and TEVAR) using a HORS. As a result, the mean ± standard deviation (SD) DAPs of TEVAR and EVAR were 323.7 ± 161.0 and 371.3 ± 186.0 Gy × cm2, respectively. The mean ± SD AKs of TEVAR and EVAR were 0.92 ± 0.44 and 1.11 ± 0.54 Gy, respectively. The mean ± SD fluoroscopy times of TEVAR and EVAR were 13.4 ± 7.1 and 23.2 ± 11.7 min, respectively. Patient radiation dose results in this study of endovascular treatments using HORSs showed no deterministic radiation effects, such as skin injuries. However, radiation exposure during TEVAR and EVAR cannot be ignored. The radiation dose should be evaluated in HORSs during endovascular treatments. Reducing/optimizing the radiation dose to the patient in HORSs is important.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haga et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: