Why the study?
Accurate characterization of cerebral hemodynamics in cerebrovascular occlusive disease is challenging due to complex intracranial anatomy, stenosis severity, collateral pathways, and microvasculature condition.
Does a combined CFD and ASL MRI modeling strategy accurately quantify patient-specific cerebral hemodynamics in cerebrovascular occlusive disease?
Does a combined CFD and ASL MRI modeling strategy accurately quantify patient-specific cerebral hemodynamics in cerebrovascular occlusive disease?
A combined CFD and ASL MRI modeling strategy can accurately quantify patient-specific cerebral hemodynamics, including collateral flow and pressure drops, in patients with cerebrovascular occlusive disease.
May enable patient-specific cerebral perfusion mapping; leaves open larger validation before clinical use in occlusive disease.
Cerebral hemodynamics in the presence of cerebrovascular occlusive disease (CVOD) are influenced by the anatomy of the intracranial arteries, the degree of stenosis, the patency of collateral pathways, and the condition of the cerebral microvasculature. Accurate characterization of cerebral hemodynamics is a challenging problem. In this work, we present a strategy to quantify cerebral hemodynamics using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) in combination with arterial spin labeling MRI (ASL). First, we calibrated patient-specific CFD outflow boundary conditions using ASL-derived flow splits in the Circle of Willis. Following, we validated the calibrated CFD model by evaluating the fractional blood supply from the main neck arteries to the vascular territories using Lagrangian particle tracking and comparing the results against vessel-selective ASL (VS-ASL). Finally, cerebral hemodynamics were assessed in two patients with CVOD and a healthy control subject. We demonstrated that the calibrated CFD model accurately reproduced the fractional blood supply to the vascular territories, as obtained from VS-ASL. The two patients revealed significant differences in pressure drop over the stenosis, collateral flow, and resistance of the distal vasculature, despite similar degrees of clinical stenosis severity. Our results demonstrated the advantages of a patient-specific CFD analysis for assessing the hemodynamic impact of stenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schollenberger et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: