Why the study?
Studies on NOAC use in unselected patients with AF showed regional differences in clinical characteristics and dosing practices, but lacked data on edoxaban.
What are the differences in clinical characteristics and dosing practices of edoxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation in Belgium and the Netherlands compared to other European countries?
What are the differences in clinical characteristics and dosing practices of edoxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation in Belgium and the Netherlands compared to other European countries?
Patients with atrial fibrillation prescribed edoxaban in Belgium and the Netherlands have better prognostic characteristics and are less frequently prescribed the reduced 30 mg dose compared to those in other European countries, though off-label underdosing rates are similar.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Regional edoxaban dosing variability may affect data generalizability; leaves open outcome differences across European populations.
BACKGROUND: Studies on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in unselected patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) show that clinical characteristics and dosing practices differ per region, but lack data on edoxaban. METHODS: With data from Edoxaban Treatment in routiNe clinical prActice for patients with AF in Europe (ETNA-AF-Europe), a large prospective observational study, we compared clinical characteristics (including the dose reduction criteria for edoxaban: creatinine clearance 15-50 ml/min, weight ≤60 kg, and/or use of strong p‑glycoprotein inhibitors) of patients from Belgium and the Netherlands (BeNe) with those from other European countries (OEC). Patients from BeNe less often had hypertension (61.6% vs 80.4%), and/or diabetes mellitus (17.3% vs 23.1%) than patients from OEC. Moreover, relatively fewer patients in BeNe were prescribed the reduced dose of 30 mg edoxaban (14.8%) than in OEC (25.4%). Overall, edoxaban was dosed according to label in 83.1% of patients. Yet, 30 mg edoxaban was prescribed in the absence of any dose reduction criteria in 36.9% of 30 mg users (5.5% of all patients) in BeNe compared with 35.5% (9.0% of all patients) in OEC. CONCLUSION: There were several notable differences between BeNe and OEC regarding clinical characteristics and dosing practices in patients prescribed edoxaban, which are relevant for the local implementation of dose evaluation and optimisation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02944019; Date of registration 24 October 2016.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vries et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: