Key result
In Chinese patients with atrial fibrillation, advanced age (≥85 years) was the strongest factor associated with receiving non-recommended edoxaban doses (OR 1.96).
Why the study?
Real-world data on the effectiveness and safety of a single non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant in the Chinese population with atrial fibrillation are limited.
Observational (n=4,930)
Open-label
Yes
Odds Ratio: 1.96 (95% CI 1.3–2.96)
p-value: p=0.001
In Chinese patients with atrial fibrillation, edoxaban dosing generally adhered to label recommendations, though advanced age, frailty, and history of TIA were associated with non-recommended dosing.
May prompt label-criteria review in elderly Chinese AF; leaves open outcome effects of age-linked off-label edoxaban dosing.
Real-world data on effectiveness and safety of a single non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant in the Chinese population with atrial fibrillation (AF) are limited. This study reports characteristics of patients treated with edoxaban and factors associated with dosing patterns from routine care in China. ETNA-AF-China (NCT04747496) is a multicentre, prospective, observational study enrolling edoxaban-treated patients from four economic regions with a targeted 2-year follow-up. Of the 4930 patients with AF (mean age: 70.2 ± 9.5 years; male, 57.1%), the mean creatinine clearance (CrCl), CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc, and HAS-BLED scores were 71.2 mL/min, 2.9, and 1.6. Overall, 6.4% of patients were perceived as frail by investigators. Available label dose reduction criteria (N = 4232) revealed that 3278 (77.5%) patients received recommended doses and 954 (22.5%) non-recommended doses. Northeast (53.0%) and West (43.1%) regions had the highest prescriptions of 60 mg and 30 mg recommended doses, respectively. Non-recommended 30 mg doses were more frequently prescribed in patients with antiplatelet use and history of heart failure than recommended 60 mg. Multivariate analysis identified advanced age as the strongest associated factor with non-recommended doses. Frailty had the strongest association with 30 mg except for age, and history of TIA was the most relevant factor associated with 60 mg. In conclusion, patients in the ETNA-AF-China study were predominantly aged 65 years and older, had mild-to-moderate renal impairment and good label adherence. Advanced age was associated with non-recommended doses, with frailty most common for non-recommended 30 mg and a history of TIA for the non-recommended 60 mg dose.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=4,930). Advanced age (≥85 years) vs. Younger age was evaluated on Non-recommended edoxaban dosing (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.30-2.96, p=0.001). In Chinese patients with atrial fibrillation, advanced age (≥85 years) was the strongest factor associated with receiving non-recommended edoxaban doses (OR 1.96).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: