Why the study?
Does a planned early invasive treatment strategy reduce cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction in patients with NSTE-ACS and normal high-sensitivity troponin?
Does a planned early invasive treatment strategy reduce cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction in patients with NSTE-ACS and normal high-sensitivity troponin?
In patients with NSTE-ACS and normal high-sensitivity troponin, a planned early invasive strategy increases procedure-related MI and bleeding without improving long-term mortality or spontaneous MI.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Caution against routine invasive strategy in NSTE-ACS with normal troponin; leaves open benefit in randomized trials.
AIMS: Current guidelines for patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) recommend early invasive treatment in intermediate-to-high risk patients based on medical history, electrocardiogram (ECG) and elevated troponin. Patients with normal levels of cardiac troponin measured with a high-sensitivity method (cTnT-hs) might not benefit from early invasive procedures. METHODS AND RESULTS: percentile (<14 ng/l) at randomisation. The outcomes in relation to a planned invasive ( n=473) vs planned conservative treatment ( n=759), were evaluated by adjusted Cox proportional hazard analyses. In patients with a normal cTnT-hs at randomisation, regardless of randomised treatment, a planned invasive vs conservative treatment was associated with a 2.3-fold higher risk (7.3% vs 3.4%, p=0.0028) for cardiovascular (CV) death or myocardial infarction (MI), driven by higher rates of procedure-related MI (3.4% vs 0.1%), while there were no differences in rates of CV death (1.3% vs 1.3%, p=0.72) or spontaneous MI (3.0% vs 2.1%, p=0.28). There were significantly more major bleeds (hazard ratio (HR) 2.98, p<0.0001), mainly due to coronary artery bypass graft (CABG)-related (HR 4.05, p<0.0001) and non-CABG procedural-related major bleeding events (HR 5.31, p=0.0175), however there were no differences in non-procedure-related major bleeding (1.5% vs 1.9%, p=0.45). Findings were consistent for patients with a normal cTnI-hs at randomisation. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NSTE-ACS and normal cTnT-hs, a planned early invasive treatment strategy was associated with increased rates of procedure-related MI and bleeding but no differences in long-term spontaneous MI, non-procedure-related bleeding or mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giannitsis et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: