Key result
An early invasive strategy reduced 12-month mortality or MI rehospitalization compared to a delayed strategy in NSTE-ACS patients with >80% troponin change.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether proportional serial cardiac troponin change predicts benefit from early versus delayed invasive or conservative management strategies across kidney function in NSTE-ACS.
Does an early invasive strategy improve outcomes compared to delayed invasive or conservative management in NSTE-ACS patients across different kidney functions and proportional troponin changes?
Cohort
Does an early invasive strategy improve outcomes compared to delayed invasive or conservative management in NSTE-ACS patients across different kidney functions and proportional troponin changes?
In NSTE-ACS patients, a >80% proportional change in serial troponin identifies those who benefit from an early versus delayed invasive strategy, regardless of kidney function.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Serial cTn change may aid risk stratification across kidney function in NSTE-ACS; leaves open whether it guides invasive timing.
AIMS: This analysis evaluates whether proportional serial cardiac troponin (cTn) change predicts benefit from an early versus delayed invasive, or conservative treatment strategies across kidney function in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). METHODS: Patients diagnosed with NSTE-ACS in the Veterans Health Administration between 1999 and 2022 were categorized into terciles (<20%, 20 to ≤80%, >80%) of proportional change in serial cTn. Primary outcome included mortality or rehospitalization for myocardial infarction at 6 and 12 months, in survivors of index admission. Adjusted hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence Intervals (95% confidence interval [CI]) were calculated for the primary outcome for an early invasive (≤24 h of the index admission), delayed invasive (>24 h of index admission to 90-days postdischarge), or a conservative management. RESULTS: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was more prevalent (45.3%) in the lowest versus 42.2% and 43% in middle and highest terciles, respectively (p < 0.001). Primary outcome is more likely for conservative versus early invasive strategy at 6 (HR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.37-1.50) and 12 months (HR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.39-1.50). A >80% proportional change demonstrated HR (95% CI): 0.90 (0.83-0.97) and 0.93 (0.88-1.00; p = 0.041) for primary outcome at 6 and 12 months, respectively, when an early versus delayed invasive strategy was used, across CKD stages. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the invasive strategy was safe and associated with improved outcomes across kidney function in NSTE-ACS. Additionally, >80% proportional change in serial troponin in NSTE-ACS is associated with benefit from an early versus a delayed invasive strategy regardless of kidney function. These findings deserve confirmation in randomized controlled trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mathew et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). Early invasive strategy (≤24 h of index admission) vs. Delayed invasive strategy or conservative management was evaluated on Mortality or rehospitalization for myocardial infarction at 6 and 12 months, in survivors of index admission (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.88-1.00, p=0.041). An early invasive strategy reduced 12-month mortality or MI rehospitalization compared to a delayed strategy in NSTE-ACS patients with >80% troponin change.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: