Why the study?
Does dabigatran 110 mg b.i.d. reduce the size of an intracardiac thrombus in a patient with atrial fibrillation and acute cardioembolic stroke?
Does dabigatran 110 mg b.i.d. reduce the size of an intracardiac thrombus in a patient with atrial fibrillation and acute cardioembolic stroke?
Low-dose dabigatran (110 mg b.i.d.) may not be effective in reducing the size of an existing left atrial appendage thrombus, as demonstrated by a case of thrombus enlargement.
Low-dose dabigatran may permit LAA thrombus growth in AF; leaves open efficacy for thrombus resolution pending prospective data.
We report a case of atrial fibrillation in a patient in whom a mobile thrombus in the left atrial appendage increased in size after low-dose dabigatran therapy. A 74-year-old man was admitted to our hospital because of sudden onset of right hemiplasia and dysarthria. On admission, his National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was three. Axial diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images and magnetic resonance angiography images showed hyperintense signals in the left front-parietal cerebral cortex without any intracranial stenotic lesions, and acute cardioembolic stroke associated with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation was diagnosed. Transesophageal echocardiography revealed a mobile thrombosis (1.0 × 2.2 cm) in the left atrial appendage, and dabigatran therapy (110 mg b.i.d.) was initiated to prevent stroke recurrence. Transesophageal echocardiography performed 6 days later revealed that the size of the thrombus had increased to 1.5 × 3.0 cm. Medication was changed to warfarin, and the thrombosis subsequently decreased in size. The patient did not have a recurrent stroke and was discharged with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of zero. This case demonstrates that low-dose dabigatran may not be effective in reducing the size of a thrombus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tabata et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: