Why the study?
Adding a hypoxic stimulus to resistance training may boost metabolic responses to enhance hypertrophy and strength, but the effects of submaximal training in normobaric hypoxia needed investigation.
Does resistance training under hypoxic conditions improve muscle performance, body composition, and haematological variables compared to normoxia in untrained subjects?
Does resistance training under hypoxic conditions improve muscle performance, body composition, and haematological variables compared to normoxia in untrained subjects?
Resistance training under hypoxic conditions increases muscle mass and decreases fat mass more effectively than in normoxia, though it does not provide additional benefits for muscle strength.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support hypoxic resistance training for body recomposition in novices; extends evidence on simulated altitude to resistance protocols without strength gains.
The addition of a hypoxic stimulus during resistance training is suggested to increase the metabolic responses, enhancing hypertrophy and muscle strength. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of resistance training performed at submaximal intensities combined with normobaric hypoxia on muscular performance, body composition and haematological parameters. Thirty-two untrained subjects participated in this study (weight: 74.6812.89 kg; height: 1750.08 cm; BMI: 24.283.80 kg/m 2 ). They were randomized to two groups: hypoxia (FiO 2 = 13%) or normoxia (FiO 2 = 20.9%). The training programme lasted 7 weeks (3 d/w) and several muscle groups were exercised (3 sets x 65-80% 1RM to failure). Measurements were taken before, after the training and after a 3-week detraining period. Body composition and muscle mass were assessed through skinfolds and muscle girths. Muscle strength was evaluated by the 1RM estimated test. Finally, haemoglobin and haematocrit were taken from the antecubital vein. Both groups improved their strength performance and muscle perimeters, but the hypoxia group obtained a greater increase in muscle mass (hypoxia: +1.80% vs. normoxia: +0.38%; p<0.05) and decrease in fat mass (hypoxia: -6.83% vs. normoxia: +1.26%; p<0.05) compared to the normoxia group. Additionally, haematocrit values were also higher for the hypoxia group after the detraining period (hypoxia: +2.20% vs. normoxia: -2.22%; p<0.05). In conclusion, resistance training under hypoxic conditions could increase muscle mass and decrease fat mass more effectively than training performed in normoxia, but without contributing to greater muscle strength.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martínez‐Guardado et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: