Key result
Short-term resistance training under normobaric hypoxia did not significantly improve squat 1RM, leg strength, or body composition compared to normoxia in untrained men.
Why the study?
Does short-term resistance training under normobaric hypoxia improve muscular performance and body composition compared to normoxia in resistance-untrained men?
RCT (n=18)
Does short-term resistance training under normobaric hypoxia improve muscular performance and body composition compared to normoxia in resistance-untrained men?
Adding normobaric hypoxia to short-term resistance training does not provide additive benefits for muscular performance or body composition in previously untrained men.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Normobaric hypoxia adds no benefit to short-term resistance training; confirms equivalent strength and composition gains versus normoxia in untrained men.
The aim of this study was to determine the effects of short-term resistance training combined with systemic hypoxia on muscular performance and body composition. Eighteen resistance-untrained men (21.3 ± 2.0 years, 172.7 ± 5.5 cm, 67.3 ± 9.7 kg) were matched and assigned to 2 experimental groups: performing 6 weeks of squat exercise training under normobaric hypoxia (H, FiO2 = 15%) or normoxia (N). In both groups, subjects performed 3 weekly sessions (a total of 18 sessions) of 3 sets of back squat at 10-repetition maximum with 2 minutes of rest between sets. Dynamic, isometric, and isokinetic leg strength and body composition were measured under normoxia before and after resistance training. Squat 1 repetition maximum (1RM) improved significantly (p ≤ 0.05) after resistance training in both H and N groups (88.9 ± 16.9 to 109.4 ± 17.0 kg and 90.0 ± 12.2 to 105.6 ± 13.3 kg, respectively). However, there were no changes in maximal isometric and isokinetic leg strength, lean body mass, and fat mass after the resistance training in both groups. In addition, no significant differences were observed between H and N groups in squat 1RM, maximal isometric and isokinetic leg strength, and body composition. The major findings of this study suggest that short-term resistance training performed under normobaric hypoxia has no additive beneficial effect on muscular performance and body composition. In practical terms, our data suggest that the use of systemic hypoxia during short-term resistance training is not a viable method to further enhance muscular performance and body composition in previously resistance-untrained men.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ho et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in Healthy (resistance-untrained) (n=18). Normobaric hypoxia vs. Normoxia was evaluated on Squat 1 repetition maximum (1RM). Short-term resistance training under normobaric hypoxia did not significantly improve squat 1RM, leg strength, or body composition compared to normoxia in untrained men.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: