Why the study?
Does short-term resistance training under normobaric hypoxia improve muscular performance and body composition compared to normoxia in resistance-untrained men?
Population
18 resistance-untrained men, mean age 21.3 ± 2.0 years, height 172.7 ± 5.5 cm, weight 67.3 ± 9.7 kg
Comparison
6 weeks of squat exercise training under… vs 6 weeks of squat exercise training under…
Design
RCT, matched and assigned
Follow-up
6 weeks
Key result
Short-term resistance training under normobaric hypoxia did not significantly improve squat 1RM, leg strength, or body composition compared to normoxia in untrained men.
Authors
Loading...
Normobaric hypoxia adds no benefit to short-term resistance training; confirms equivalent strength and composition gains versus normoxia in untrained men.
RCT (n=18)
Does short-term resistance training under normobaric hypoxia improve muscular performance and body composition compared to normoxia in resistance-untrained men?
Absolute Event Rate: 109.4% vs 105.6%
Adding normobaric hypoxia to short-term resistance training does not provide additive benefits for muscular performance or body composition in previously untrained men.
Ho et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in Healthy (resistance-untrained) (n=18). Normobaric hypoxia vs. Normoxia was evaluated on Squat 1 repetition maximum (1RM). Short-term resistance training under normobaric hypoxia did not significantly improve squat 1RM, leg strength, or body composition compared to normoxia in untrained men.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: