Why the study?
Does hypercapnic acidosis alter left ventricular mechanoenergetics and the oxygen cost of contractility in dog hearts?
Does hypercapnic acidosis alter left ventricular mechanoenergetics and the oxygen cost of contractility in dog hearts?
Hypercapnic acidosis causes left ventricular contractile dysfunction and increases the oxygen cost of contractility, likely due to decreased calcium sensitivity of contractile proteins.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypercapnic acidosis may impair LV efficiency in dogs; leaves open translation to human ventricular energetics.
The effect of acidosis on left ventricular (LV) mechanoenergetics was assessed in seven excised, cross-circulated dog hearts with the use of the frameworks of the contractility index (Emax) and the relationship between myocardial oxygen consumption (VO2) and pressure-volume area (PVA; a measure of the LV total mechanical energy). Acidosis was stably maintained without hypoxia by appropriately mixing CO2 and air in a membrane oxygenator in the coronary arterial perfusion circuit. Acidosis [pH: 6.98 +/- 0.09 (SD), PCO2: 91 +/- 25 mmHg in the coronary arterial blood] decreased Emax by 45 +/- 12% (P < 0.01) and PVA by 47 +/- 12% (P < 0.01) at a fixed LV volume. When the preacidosis Emax level was restored by Ca2+ infusion during acidosis, unloaded VO2 (the VO2 intercept of the VO2-PVA relation) exceeded the control value by 19 +/- 17% (P < 0.05), indicating that acidosis required higher VO2 for nonmechanical activities at a matched Emax. Moreover, the oxygen cost of enhanced contractility (the incremental ratio of unloaded VO2 to Emax) was 1.53 +/- 0.40 times higher (P < 0.01) during acidosis than preacidosis. We conclude that acidosis results in LV contractile dysfunction accompanied by an increased oxygen cost of contractility. This increased energy cost of the excitation-contraction coupling can be accounted for by a decreased Ca2+ sensitivity of the contractile proteins during acidosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hata et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: