Why the study?
Real-world medication usage and safety outcomes, specifically bleeding, in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients undergoing stent implantation have not been well assessed.
Do DOACs reduce clinically relevant bleeding compared to VKAs in Japanese patients with ischemic heart disease and non-valvular atrial fibrillation undergoing PCI?
Do DOACs reduce clinically relevant bleeding compared to VKAs in Japanese patients with ischemic heart disease and non-valvular atrial fibrillation undergoing PCI?
In a real-world cohort of Japanese patients with NVAF undergoing PCI, DOAC use was associated with a numerically lower but statistically nonsignificant risk of clinically relevant bleeding compared to VKAs.
Nonsignificant lower bleeding with DOACs does not support practice change; leaves open need for randomized confirmation in Japanese post-PCI patients.
BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend early termination of triple therapy and the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), due to safety concerns. However, to date, real-world medication usage and safety outcomes (specifically bleeding) in NVAF patients with stent implantation have not been well assessed. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational, medical database cohort study in Japanese ischemic heart disease (IHD) patients with NVAF who underwent PCI between 2012 and 2017. The primary outcome was clinically relevant bleeding; secondary outcomes included individual bleeding events. A multivariate analysis was conducted to identify risk factors affecting the occurrence of clinically relevant bleeding events. RESULTS: The analysis population comprised 5695 patients [3530 received DOACs and 2165 received vitamin K antagonists (VKAs)]. The incidence of primary outcome events (clinically relevant bleeding/100 patient-years) was 6.05 in the DOAC group and 8.42 in the VKA group, resulting in a nonsignificant 21% lower risk in the DOAC group. The DOAC group also had a nonsignificant 24%, 24%, and 34% lower risk of bleeding requiring transfusion, intracranial bleeding, and lower gastrointestinal bleeding, respectively, compared with the VKA group. A multivariate analysis of the primary outcome showed a significantly higher risk of bleeding among older patients and those with lower body weight and abnormal renal function. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective real-world evaluation of IHD patients with NVAF and PCI, DOAC-treated patients had a lower risk of developing clinically relevant bleeding compared with the VKA group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakamura et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: