Key result
Sulphonylureas linked to ~92% higher all-cause mortality versus non-sulphonylurea treatments.
Meta-Analysis (n=551,912)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We conducted a meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies to evaluate all-cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who received sulphonylurea (SU) treatment, when compared to any other diabetes treatment. Only studies reporting raw data on mortality during SU treatment were included. Data were combined using random-effects (RE) models. Unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) are presented. Of 4991 publication titles and abstracts reviewed, 20 studies (n = 551,912 patients) were included. For cohort studies (n = 276,050), patients receiving SU monotherapy or combination treatment had significantly higher all-cause and CV mortality risks compared to any non-SU treatment [all-cause, 13 studies: OR = 1.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.48-2.49; CV, 5 studies: OR = 2.72, 95% CI = 1.95-3.79]. Validity was limited by the high treatment group heterogeneity (I (2) > 90%) and study-inherent biases/design differences. In conclusion, patients receiving SU treatment had increased all-cause and CV mortality risks. However, the meta-analysis was limited by the high heterogeneity of non-randomized studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Först et al. (2013) conducted a meta-analysis in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=551,912). Sulphonylurea monotherapy or combination treatment vs. Any non-sulphonylurea diabetes treatment was evaluated on All-cause mortality (and cardiovascular mortality) (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.48-2.49). Sulphonylurea treatment was associated with higher all-cause and cardiovascular mortality vs non-sulphonylurea treatments.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: