Why the study?
Does thoracic epidural anesthesia plus light general anesthesia improve systemic hemodynamic function and oxygen supply-demand relationship in patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery compared to general anesthesia?
Does thoracic epidural anesthesia plus light general anesthesia improve systemic hemodynamic function and oxygen supply-demand relationship in patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery compared to general anesthesia?
In patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery, thoracic epidural anesthesia has no apparent advantage over general anesthesia regarding systemic hemodynamic function and oxygen supply-demand.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Thoracic epidural anesthesia confers no hemodynamic advantage in abdominal aortic surgery; challenges routine addition to general anesthesia and supports reevaluation in guidelines.
The effects of thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) on total body oxygen supply-demand ratio are complex due to potential influences on both O2 delivery (QO2) and consumption (VO2). One hundred and five patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery were randomly assigned to one of three groups to compare the cardiovascular and metabolic responses associated with (1) thoracic epidural anesthesia plus light general anesthesia (group TEA); (2) general anesthesia with halothane (group H); and (3) neuroleptanalgesia (group NLA). Values of cardiac index (CI) and QO2 were less intraoperatively in the TEA group than in the H or NLA groups, while VO2 values were similar. VO2 during recovery was greater in both the TEA and NLA groups than in the H group. Consequently the oxygen supply-demand ratio (QO2/VO2) was less in the TEA group throughout the perioperative period and about 30% below baseline values during early recovery. At comparable VO2, CI and mixed venous O2 saturation were always less in the TEA group than in the NLA group. Heart rate was slowest intraoperatively during TEA, and stroke work was less with TEA than with NLA. As cardiac filling pressure and systemic vascular resistance did not differ among the three groups, reduced adaptation of CI to tissue O2 needs during TEA was attributed to negative inotropic and chronotropic effects of the sympathetic blockade. We conclude that in patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery, TEA has no apparent advantage over general anesthesia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reinhart et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: