Why the study?
The impact of body mass index on long-term outcome in patients with coronary chronic total occlusion was less clear.
Does high BMI reduce 3-year all-cause mortality in patients with coronary chronic total occlusion?
Does high BMI reduce 3-year all-cause mortality in patients with coronary chronic total occlusion?
Higher BMI is associated with better long-term survival in patients with coronary chronic total occlusion, supporting the existence of an obesity paradox in this population.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support obesity paradox in CTO; hypothesis-generating and should not change practice.
BACKGROUND: Obesity is associated with metabolic syndrome which increases further risk of coronary artery disease and adverse cardiovascular events. Impact of body mass index (BMI) on long-term outcome in patients with coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) is less clear. METHOD AND Clinical outcomes were 3-year all-cause mortality, 3-year cardiovascular mortality and 3-year non-fatal myocardial infarct. During the 3-year follow-up period, all-cause mortality was significantly higher in patients with low BMI group compared to those in high BMI groups (14% vs. 6%, p = .0001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed patients with high BMI groups had significant better survival compared with those in low BMI group (p = .0001). In multivariate analysis, higher BMI was independently associated with decreased risk of 3-year all-cause mortality (Hazard ratio [HR]: 0.534; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.349-0.819, p = .004) after controlling for age, renal function, prior history of stroke, coronary artery bypass graft, co-morbidities with peripheral arterial disease, heart failure and revascularization status for CTO. In propensity-matched multivariate analysis, high BMI remained a significant predictor of 3-year all-cause mortality (HR, 0.525; 95% CI, 0.346-0.795, p = .002). CONCLUSION: Higher BMI was associated with better long-term outcome in patients with coronary CTO.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsai et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: