Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective To investigate preoperative predictors for anterior and posterior capsule laxity during phacoemulsification combined with anti-glaucoma surgery in eyes with angle closure. Methods Cross-sectional study. Patients aged ≥ 40 years diagnosed with angle closure who underwent phacoemulsification combined with anti-glaucoma surgery between May 2023 and May 2025 were enrolled. Eyes were classified into four groups based on intraoperative findings: anterior capsule laxity, posterior capsule laxity, combined capsule laxity, and normal capsule. Mixed-effects logistic regression analysis was employed to determine the independent predictors of anterior and posterior capsule laxity, respectively. Results A total of 241 eyes of 203 patients were included. 36 eyes (14.9%) had anterior laxity, 51 (21.2%) had posterior laxity, 73 (30.3%) had combined capsule laxity, and 81 (33.6%) had normal capsule. Eyes with anterior laxity tended to be acute primary angle closure (APAC) (P=0.001) with shallower anterior chamber depth (ACD) (P<0.001). Posterior/combined laxity eyes showed higher vitreous zonule (VZ) absence (both P<0.001), with combined laxity having thicker lens (P=0.006). Regression analysis identified APAC diagnosis (P = 0.049) and shallower ACD (P = 0.001) as independent predictors for anterior capsule laxity, while APAC diagnosis (P = 0.026), VZ absence (P<0.001), and increased ciliary body maximum thickness (CBMT) (P = 0.007) predicted posterior capsule laxity. Conclusions APAC diagnosis and shallow ACD predict anterior capsule laxity, whilst VZ absence, APAC diagnosis, and increased CBMT indicate posterior capsule laxity in eyes with angle closure. Identification of these biomarkers before surgery may help surgeons anticipate complications and optimise postoperative outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: