Why the study?
Does atrioventricular nodal ablation improve quality of life and survival in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy, atrial fibrillation, and inadequate biventricular pacing?
Does atrioventricular nodal ablation improve quality of life and survival in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy, atrial fibrillation, and inadequate biventricular pacing?
AVNA in CRT patients with AF and inadequate biventricular pacing significantly improves ventricular capture and provides sustained long-term improvement in NYHA functional class.
Supports atrioventricular nodal ablation to optimize biventricular pacing in atrial fibrillation.
OBJECTIVES: Atrioventricular nodal ablation (AVNA) is recommended for patients (pts) with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) having atrial fibrillation (AF) and incomplete ventricular capture (Class IIa, level B). AVNA reduces mortality and improves the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class during intermediate term follow-up. The objectives were to study the long-term outcome regarding quality of life (QoL) and survival of our CRT pts after AVNA. DESIGN: 37 CRT-pts undergoing AVNA due to inadequate biventricular pacing were included in the study. Data were retrospectively obtained from clinical records and through telephone interviews. RESULTS: Twenty pts died during the follow-up period of average 30.6 ± 24 months. After AVNA the ventricular capture improved significantly from 68.4 ± 23% to 98.5 ± 2% (p < 0.001). A significant and sustained improvement of average 0.3 ± 0.5 (p = 0.001) in NYHA functional class was found. Additionally a large percentage of pts discontinued taking rate reducing drugs with potential severe side effects. CONCLUSION: AVNA in CRT pts was safe and effective. The treatment resulted in a sustained improvement in QoL, including long-term improvement in NYHA functional class.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aune et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: