Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
As the cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) time increases, patient prognosis and neurological outcomes are expected to worsen. Although the effectiveness of introducing ECMO in CPR has been discussed, there are currently no definitive criteria for the use of extracorporeal CPR with a lack of evidence. Here, we report a case of a 12-year-old female with severe myocarditis who survived out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation due to the introduction of extracorporeal CPR after long-duration conventional CPR (total conventional CPR time: 73 minutes). Inter-hospital transport under veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) support was performed after extracorporeal CPR by the previous hospital. On admission to the pediatric intensive care unit, the patient's pupils were severely dilated with sluggish light reflexes. The condition of the pupils immediately improved after increasing the flow of VA-ECMO from 1.7 to 2.4 L/min/m2. The patient received medical support, including systemic steroids, immunoglobin, and 48 hours of therapy for mild hypothermia, and she demonstrated recovery of cardiac function in the first 6 days after admission. The patient was discharged from the hospital with a normal functional status. Extracorporeal CPR has to be considered even for long-duration CPR, and in which case it is important to make careful assessments of the presence of factors (e.g., initial rhythm, the quality of conventional CPR, the time to conventional CPR initiation) before starting extracorporeal CPR. In neurological evaluation, ECMO flow should be sufficient to ensure cardiac output. The present case also suggests that good-quality CPR with ECMO may compensate for its CPR length.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shono et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: