Why the study?
Sample entropy has limitations in processing short-term heart rate variability segments due to extreme parameter dependence, prompting evaluation of nonparametric sample entropy in obstructive sleep apnea.
Does nonparametric sample entropy (NPSampEn) improve the accuracy of short-term HRV analysis for detecting obstructive sleep apnea compared to standard sample entropy and LF/HF ratio?
Does nonparametric sample entropy (NPSampEn) improve the accuracy of short-term HRV analysis for detecting obstructive sleep apnea compared to standard sample entropy and LF/HF ratio?
Nonparametric sample entropy provides higher accuracy than standard sample entropy and LF/HF ratio for detecting obstructive sleep apnea using short-term heart rate variability analysis.
NPSampEn may aid short-term HRV OSA screening; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with reduced heart rate variability (HRV) and autonomic nervous system dysfunction. Sample entropy (SampEn) is commonly used for regularity analysis. However, it has limitations in processing short-term segments of HRV signals due to the extreme dependence of its functional parameters. We used the nonparametric sample entropy (NPSampEn) as a novel index for short-term HRV analysis in the case of OSA. The manuscript included 60 6-h electrocardiogram recordings (20 healthy, 14 mild-moderate OSA, and 26 severe OSA) from the PhysioNet database. The NPSampEn value was compared with the SampEn value and frequency domain indices. The empirical results showed that NPSampEn could better differentiate the three groups (p < 0.01) than the ratio of low frequency power to high frequency power (LF/HF) and SampEn. Moreover, NPSampEn (83.3%) approached a higher OSA screening accuracy than the LF/HF (73.3%) and SampEn (68.3%). Compared with SampEn (|r| = 0.602, p < 0.05), NPSampEn (|r| = 0.756, p < 0.05) had a significantly stronger association with the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). Hence, NPSampEn can fully overcome the influence of individual differences that are prevalent in biomedical signal processing, and might be useful in processing short-term segments of HRV signal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: