Why the study?
Does a restrictive transmitral filling pattern predict all-cause mortality in patients hospitalized for symptomatic heart failure?
Does a restrictive transmitral filling pattern predict all-cause mortality in patients hospitalized for symptomatic heart failure?
A restrictive transmitral filling pattern (deceleration time ≤140 ms) is a strong, independent predictor of mortality in patients hospitalized for heart failure, regardless of ejection fraction.
Restrictive filling pattern may refine mortality risk assessment in hospitalized HF independent of LVEF; leaves open prospective validation for clinical use.
AIMS: A restrictive transmitral filling (RF) pattern predicts increased mortality in heart failure (HF) with reduced left ventricular (LV) systolic function. We performed a combined evaluation of LV function and RF for prognosis in patients with HF with and without systolic dysfunction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Doppler echocardiography was performed in 972 patients with symptomatic HF. RF was considered present when deceleration time (DT) was <or=140 ms and non-RF when >140 ms. A DT >240 ms was defined as delayed relaxation. During a median of 51 months the unadjusted all-cause mortality rates were significantly increased among patients with RF vs. the non-RF group (1- and 4-year mortality was 25% and 54% vs. 17% and 43%). In a multivariable model, RF was a significant predictor of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio (HR)=2.0, 95% confidence interval (CI):1.5-2.6) whereas delayed relaxation was without prognostic importance (HR=0.9, CI:0.5-1.6). Repeating the multivariable model in subgroups of wall motion index (WMI) showed that RF was a strong predictor of mortality independent of WMI. For patients with LVEF of at least 50%, HR for RF was 2.0 (CI:1.1-3.4; p=0.02) and interaction between LVEF and RF was not significant. CONCLUSION: In a heterogeneous population hospitalised for symptomatic HF a restrictive transmitral filling pattern, defined as shortened deceleration time, during hospitalisation is an ominous prognostic sign independent of LV systolic function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akkan et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: