Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: The D immunoprophylaxis program has successfully reduced the incidence of Rh hemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN), but it has also reduced the availability of plasma-derived polyclonal anti-D, which constitutes the current therapeutic product. Human monoclonal anti-D from hybridoma cell lines may be an acceptable alternative, and clinical efficacy of each anti-D is being evaluated in several centers. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This study represents the largest assessment (outside of the International Workshops) of human D monoclonal antibodies for potential therapeutic use. The in vitro biologic activity and immunologic and serologic reactivity of a coded panel of 20 D antibodies (THERAD) was investigated. The bioassays used were lymphocyte (K-cell) antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), monocyte ADCC, and monocyte chemiluminescence, which together reflect the processes involved in antibody-coated red cell destruction in vivo. From this panel, six antibodies (THERADs 14, 19, 22, 23, 27, and 28, comprising 3 IgG1 and 3 IgG3 D monoclonal antibodies) were further selected to investigate the effects of blending in the three bioassays. RESULTS: Several THERAD blends displayed greater activity than their component parts, in the range of 6 to 124 percent. There was no evidence to suggest functional blocking effects with this restricted panel of antibodies. CONCLUSION: The THERAD blends containing both IgG1 and IgG3 anti-D appeared to be the most functionally active, as did blends containing antibodies to two distinct D epitopes. This in vitro evidence has important implications for the future formulation of an effective monoclonal preparation for the prevention of Rh HDN.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Armstrong‐Fisher et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: