Why the study?
Electronic health record data can measure cardiovascular health but have limited generalizability when derived from a single health care system.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Despite some improvements in outpatient cardiovascular health metrics from 2012 to 2015, overall progress remains insufficient to meet the AHA's 2020 Impact Goals.
BACKGROUND: Electronic health record (EHR) data can measure cardiovascular health (CVH) of patient populations, but have limited generalizability when derived from one health care system. OBJECTIVE: We used The Guideline Advantage™ (TGA) data repository, comprising EHR data of patients from 8 diverse health care systems, to describe CVH of adult patients and progress towards the American Heart Association's (AHA's) 2020 Impact Goals. METHODS: Our analysis included 203,488 patients with 677,733 encounters recorded in TGA from 2012 to 2015. Five measures from EHRs [cigarette smoking status, body mass index (BMI), blood pressure (BP), cholesterol, and diabetes mellitus (DM)] were categorized as poor/intermediate/ideal according to AHA's Life's Simple 7 algorithm. We presented distributions and trends of CVH for each metric over time, first using all available data, and then in a subsample (n = 1,890) of patients with complete data on all metrics. RESULTS: Among all patients, the greatest stride towards ideal CVH attainment from 2012 to 2015 was for cigarette smoking (50.6 percent to 65 percent), followed by DM (17.3 percent to 20.7 percent) and BP (21.1 percent to 23.2 percent). Overall, prevalence of ideal CVH did not increase for any metric in the subsample. Males slightly improved in ideal CVH for BMI and cholesterol; meanwhile, females saw no improvement in ideal CVH for any metric. As ideal CVH for BP and cholesterol increased slightly among white patients, ideal CVH for BP, cholesterol, BMI, and DM worsened for non-whites. CONCLUSION: Despite improvements in some CVH metrics in the outpatient setting, more tangible progress is needed to meet AHA's 2020 Impact Goals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rudy et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: