Why the study?
Does coadministration of P12A3C-pcDNA and IL18 pcDNA plasmids improve immune response and protection against foot-and-mouth disease virus in guinea-pigs?
Does coadministration of P12A3C-pcDNA and IL18 pcDNA plasmids improve immune response and protection against foot-and-mouth disease virus in guinea-pigs?
Coadministration of IL-18 with a DNA vaccine against foot-and-mouth disease enhances humoral and cellular immune responses and improves protection against viral challenge in a guinea-pig model.
Supports IL-18 adjuvants in guinea pig FMDV DNA vaccines; hypothesis-generating and should not change veterinary practice.
Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is a highly contagious disease of cloven-hoofed animals causing considerable economic loss in the affected countries. The presently used tissue-cultured inactivated vaccine protects the vaccinated animals for a short duration of immunity. As one of the approaches to develop alternative vaccines, P12A3C-pcDNA (containing P12A and 3C coding sequences of foot-and-mouth disease virus) and bovine IL18 pcDNA plasmids were constructed and the immune response of these constructs was evaluated when they were coinoculated in guinea-pigs. The humoral response was analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (for levels of IgG1, IgG2) and a serum neutralization test (SNT), and the cellular response using an MTT assay. Significantly higher humoral and cell-mediated immune responses were seen in the P12A3C and the IL-18 coinoculated group than that in P12A3C-pcDNA alone and inactivated virus vaccine inoculated groups. Similarly, a higher population of CD4(+) , CD8(+) and T-helper type 1 (Th1), and Th2 cytokine levels were seen in the former group in comparison with the other groups. P12A3C+IL-18 protected all the six animals when challenged with a homologous virus compared with five and four in an inactivated virus vaccine and the P12A3C-pcDNA groups, respectively. These results have shown that the plasmid encoding for P12A3C-pcDNA, when coinoculated with IL-18, induced higher responses and protected the animals from a virus challenge.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rao et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: