Calsequestrin ablation reveals a differential reliance on the protein between muscle types, causing structural damage in slow fibers (Soleus) and severe functional decline during tetanic stimulation in fast fibers (EDL).
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CASQ ablation effects differ by skeletal fiber type; warrants caution extrapolating to cardiac SR function and leaves translation hypothesis-generating.
We compared structure and function of EDL and Soleus muscles in adult (4-6 m) mice lacking both Calsequestrin (CASQ) isoforms, the main SR Ca²⁺-binding proteins. Lack of CASQ induced ultrastructural alterations in ~30% of Soleus fibers, but not in EDL. Twitch time parameters were prolonged in both muscles, although tension was not reduced. However, when stimulated for 2 sec at 100 hz, Soleus was able to sustain contraction, while in EDL active tension declined by 70-80%. The results presented in this paper unmask a differential effect of CASQ1&2 ablation in fast versus slow fibers. CASQ is essential in EDL to provide large amount of Ca²⁺ released from the SR during tetanic stimulation. In contrast, Soleus deals much better with lack of CASQ because slow fibers require lower Ca²⁺ amounts and slower cycling to function properly. Nevertheless, Soleus suffers more severe structural damage, possibly because SR Ca²⁺ leak is more pronounced.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paolini et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: