Why the study?
Does supracoronary replacement of the ascending aorta with root reconstruction provide satisfactory outcomes in patients with dissecting aortic aneurysm and aortic insufficiency?
Does supracoronary replacement of the ascending aorta with root reconstruction provide satisfactory outcomes in patients with dissecting aortic aneurysm and aortic insufficiency?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supracoronary replacement of the ascending aorta with root reconstruction is a viable sparing procedure for dissecting aortic aneurysms with aortic insufficiency, with an 11% hospital mortality.
Patients with dissecting aortic aneurysm and associated acute aortic insufficiency form a group of seriously ill patients with significant cardiac failure, generally involving other organs and systems. It justifies an attempt to reduce a surgical risk, by using more sparing procedures, including supracoronary replacement of the ascending aorta with its root reconstruction. The latter has been performed in 27 patients (mean 54,5 ± 2,1 years) with dissecting aortic aneurysm and aortic valvular insufficiency in 1996 to 2009. The major etiological factor was atherosclerosis (88%)/ Seventeen (63%), 6 (22,2%) and 4 (16%) had types I, IIA and II dissection, respectively. Overall hospital mortality was 11%. In late period, progressive aneurysm dissection needed reinterventions in 2 cases. The competence of the reconstructed aortic valve was satisfactory both just after surgery and throughout the follow-up. Indications for this option of chronic correction, surgical techniques, and immediate and long-term results are outlined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Г. А. Акопов (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: