Why the study?
Do novel biomarkers improve the accuracy and clinical utility of coronary heart disease risk prediction compared to existing tools in the Korean population?
Do novel biomarkers improve the accuracy and clinical utility of coronary heart disease risk prediction compared to existing tools in the Korean population?
This review highlights statistical methods and the clinical utility of novel biomarkers for improving coronary heart disease risk prediction, particularly in the Korean population.
Supports Korean-specific CHD risk model development; leaves open whether novel biomarkers add clinical utility beyond standard tools.
Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Many risk prediction models have been developed in an effort to assist clinicians in risk assessment and the prevention of CHD. However, it is unclear whether the existing CHD prediction tools can improve clinical performance, and recently, there has been a lot of effort being made to improve the accuracy of the prediction models. A large number of novel biomarkers have been identified to be associated with cardiovascular risk, and studied with the goal of improving the accuracy and clinical utility of CHD risk prediction. Yet, controversy still remains with regard to the utility of novel biomarkers in CHD risk assessment, and in finding the best statistical methods to assess the incremental value of the biomarkers. This article discusses the statistical approaches that can be used to evaluate the predictive values of new biomarkers, and reviews the clinical utility of novel biomarkers in CHD prediction, specifically in the Korean population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hyeon Chang Kim (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: